An Awkward Question…
I have an awkward question for which I do not have any answer and would value some comments and opinions.
I support the campaign to eliminate all forms of discrimination against people on the basis of their race, creed, gender and sexual orientation.
Currently, the ‘hot topic’ in this field is the need to reform the civil contract of marriage so as to open it from being only between 1 man and 1 woman to being between any two people.
But, I ask myself, why, if we are giving up the prescription for gender, are we not giving up the enumerative prescription? That is, why are we limiting it to just 2 people.
Why cannot say 3 people or 4 people pool their assets for common support and cherishing?
Only askin’…..answers on a postcard, pls.
(Yes, this is a whole new ‘can of worms’, isn’t it….)